Q5. (a) Usually schools, working in remote areas, do not fully comply with government regulations. However, if the rules are enforced strictly, it would lead to most schools closing down. How should an administrator strike a balance between enforcement of rules and educational rights of children? (GS PAPER IV MODEL ANSWER) (UPSC CSE 2026) (150 words, 10 marks)

ANS.

STRUCTURE

1. Explain the statement CONTEXT in brief

2. Then explain administrator strike a balance between enforcement of rules and educational rights of children with examples

3. Conclusion with a philosophy or quote

THE CONTEXT (INTRODUCTION)

A NITI Aayog report, “School Education System in India — Temporal Analysis and Policy Roadmap for Quality Enhancement” (2026), flags this as a structural “pyramid problem”: broad access at entry, sharp attrition thereafter, both in schools and students. Roughly 94,000 government schools closed over the last decade.

An administrator in this scenario faces a classic dilemma between deontological rule enforcement (strict compliance) and utilitarian/rights-based welfare (ensuring access to the fundamental Right to Education under Article 21A).

BODY

Remote schools often fall short of RTE Act, 2009 norms — pupil-teacher ratio, infrastructure, trained-teacher requirements — not from neglect but from genuine resource scarcity.

Administrator striking a balance between enforcement of rules and educational rights of children:

1. Categorization of Non-Compliance Norms (Zero Tolerance): Structural safety (fire safety, stable buildings), basic sanitation (functional toilets, drinking water), and child protection policies. Failure here poses an immediate threat to life and dignity; non-compliant schools must rectify these immediately or face temporary suspension.

2. Implementation of a Phased Compliance Plan: Issue conditional operational licenses giving schools a realistic timeframe (e.g., 12–18 months) to meet mandatory benchmarks, rather than summary closures.

3. School Management Committees (SMCs): Empower SMCs and Gram Panchayats to monitor compliance, mobilize local funds, and report genuine field constraints.

4. Alternative Transition Mechanisms Before Closure

5. School rationalisation/merger drives: consolidating low-enrolment schools into composite schools with shared infrastructure and staff (SATH-E model).

6. Third-party quality assessment and strengthened governance structures in state education

7. NEP 2020 structural reform: 5+3+3+4 curricular structure, stronger focus on Early Childhood Care and Education (ECCE).

8. Composite/cluster schools and proposals for a NIRF-like school ranking system and PISA-type Class 10 assessment.

JHARKHAND — “EK SHALA EK PARISAR” (ONE SCHOOL, ONE CAMPUS): Under NITI Aayog’s SATH-E project, Jharkhand merged 4,380 schools onto shared campuses, saving an estimated ₹400 crore.

CONCLUSION

Rules are designed to serve human welfare, not suppress it. The role of an administrator is not merely that of a punitive regulator, but of a facilitator of constitutional rights. As Rawls held, “each person possesses an inviolability founded on justice that even the welfare of society as a whole cannot override” — a remote child’s access to her only school is exactly the kind of individual claim that a system-wide compliance target cannot simply override.

Spread the Word
Index