ONLINE GAMING NEEDS A UNIFIED POLICY, NOT DISPARATE STATE LAWS

THE CONTEXT: The online gaming industry in India has experienced exponential growth, with the country now home to over 500 million gamers, making it the second-largest market globally after China. This rapid expansion has brought both opportunities and challenges, necessitating a comprehensive regulatory framework to ensure user protection and industry growth.

 CURRENT REGULATORY FRAMEWORK:

  • Historical context: The gaming industry in India has been regulated for nearly a century under the Public Gambling Act of 1867 and Section 108 of the Indian Penal Code. These laws primarily addressed physical gambling and cheating in games.
  • Recent developments: The IT Act, 2000 and the IT Amendment Rules of 2023 have attempted to define online gaming and introduce a registration mechanism with self-regulatory boards (SRBs). However, the implementation of these rules has been incomplete, with no SRBs established or clear criteria for distinguishing games of skill from games of chance.

CHALLENGES IN THE CURRENT REGULATORY LANDSCAPE:

  • Lack of unified national policy: The absence of a comprehensive national policy has led to fragmented state regulations, creating confusion and enforcement difficulties.
  • Inconsistencies between state regulations: Different states have implemented varying regulations, making it challenging for gaming companies to operate across India.
  • Difficulty in enforcing state-specific laws for online platforms: The borderless nature of online gaming makes it nearly impossible to restrict games geographically based on state-specific regulations.
  • Inability to address modern gaming dynamics: The rapid evolution of online gaming has outpaced existing regulations, leaving users vulnerable to potential risks.

NEED FOR A UNIFIED REGULATORY FRAMEWORK:

  • Benefits of unified legislation (examples from other sectors): Unified legislation across various industries has helped standardize practices, improve transparency, and reduce compliance burdens. For instance, the National Digital Communications Policy (NDCP) improved ease of doing business in the telecom sector.
  • Potential advantages for the gaming industry: A unified framework could provide clarity for operators, enhance user protection, and foster industry growth. It would also encourage innovation and attract foreign investment.

KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE Gujarat National Law University (GNLU) REPORT:

  • Unified legal framework: The report calls for a uniform central law to replace fragmented state regulations.
  • Dedicated regulatory body: A central regulatory authority is needed to oversee the industry, ensure compliance, and promote responsible practices.
  • User protection measures: The report recommends mandatory limit-setting features for users, allowing them to set daily limits on gaming time and expenditure.

INDUSTRY SELF-REGULATION EFFORTS:

  • Self-regulatory organizations (SROs): The industry has taken steps to address concerns through self-regulation, including the establishment of SROs.
  • Age verification measures: SROs have implemented age verification to prevent underage access to real-money games.
  • Spending and playtime limits: Features allowing players to set limits on spending and playtime have been introduced.
  • KYC verification and anti-money laundering measures: The industry has adopted know-your-customer (KYC) verification and monitoring of digital records to prevent potential money laundering.

THE WAY FORWARD:

  • Central registration system: A centralized system for registering online games is essential to ensure compliance and user protection.
  • Clear differentiation between games of skill and chance: Establishing clear criteria to distinguish between games of skill and chance is crucial for effective regulation.
  • Encouraging innovation and investment: A balanced regulatory approach can foster innovation and attract investment in the sector.
  • Balancing growth with user protection: Regulations should aim to protect users while allowing the industry to grow and contribute to the economy.

THE CONCLUSION:

The online gaming industry in India presents significant economic potential, with projections suggesting it could reach $6 billion by 2028 and potentially represent a $60 billion opportunity by 2034. However, realizing this potential requires addressing the current regulatory challenges. A unified, national-level regulatory framework that balances user protection with industry growth is essential.

UPSC PAST YEAR QUESTIONS:

Q.1 Discuss Section 66A of IT Act, with reference to its alleged violation of Article 19 of the Constitution. 2013

Q.2 Has the Indian governmental system responded adequately to the demands of Liberalization, Privatization and Globalization started in 1991? What can the government do to be responsive to this important change? 2016

MAINS PRACTICE QUESTION:

Q.1 Discuss the challenges faced by the online gaming industry in India due to the current regulatory landscape. Suggest measures to address these challenges while ensuring user protection and industry growth.

SOURCE:

https://www.outlookbusiness.com/columns/online-gaming-needs-a-unified-policy-not-disparate-state-laws

Spread the Word
Index