May 9, 2024

Lukmaan IAS

A Blog for IAS Examination

RECOGNITION OF SCHEDULED CASTES (SCS) IN ANDAMAN AND NICOBAR ISLANDS

image_printPrint

TAG: GS 2: POLITY AND GOVERNANCE

THE CONTEXT: Recently, the UT administration has been directed to set up a panel to look into issues faced by SCs, who have been clubbed with OBCs till now.

HISTORICAL BACKGROUND: ABSENCE OF SC RECOGNITION

  • Omission in Census and Constitutional Order
    • The Andaman and Nicobar (A&N) Islands have never officially acknowledged any Scheduled Caste (SC) community.
    • The absence of SCs was highlighted as a critical issue by the National Commission for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (NCSCST) in 1999.
    • Despite efforts, no SC population was recorded in both the 2001 and 2011 Censuses, confirmed by government reports in 2015.
  • Refugees and Wrong Categorization
    • The identified SC-like populace in the A&N Islands were refugees from Bangladesh resettled by the Indian government’s Refugee Relief and Rehabilitation Department till 1980.
    • This demography was classified under the Other Backward Classes (OBCs) rather than SCs, a misclassification noted in various reports.

PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEE INTERVENTION

  • Committee’s Directive and Observations
    • The Parliamentary Committee on Welfare of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes has emphasized the existence of SCs in the A&N Islands.
    • It recommended a specialized panel formation to address SC-specific issues, including representation and welfare schemes.
  • Lack of Census and Identification Challenges
    • The committee’s recommendation was based on first-hand information gathered during an August visit to the islands.
    • However, recognizing SCs poses challenges, as there is limited information regarding their communities, socio-economic status, and classification necessities for Parliament’s recognition.

RESERVATION AND CATEGORIZATION DILEMMA

  • OBC Commission’s Classification and Reservation
    • Earlier, the A&N Islands’ OBC Commission categorized the Bangladeshi refugees, possibly SCs, under the “Post-1942 settlers” within OBCs, acknowledged due to Indra Sawhney’s judgment.
    • The OBC reservation strategy accounted for the potential inclusion of these individuals as SCs, redirecting the SC reservation percentage into the OBC reservation pool.
  • Uncertain Roadmap and Census Data
    • The absence of SC recognition in both the 2001 and 2011 Censuses complicates the establishment of their identity and need for social classification.
    • Notably, the 2011 Socio-Economic Census data remains undisclosed, and the 2021 Census is pending.

FUTURE CHALLENGES AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS

  • Challenges in Identification and Representation
    • The absence of census data poses challenges for the administration to identify, classify, and address the socio-economic concerns of the supposed SCs, a situation that warrants Parliament’s recognition and Presidential notification.
  • Policy Impact and Administrative Responses
    • The parliamentary committee’s directive urges the Union Territory administration to address the representation and welfare of the unidentified SC populace, potentially impacting government schemes and affirmative action policies.

SOURCE: https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Delhi/scs-were-never-counted-in-andaman-and-nicobar-now-a-parliamentary-committee-sits-up-and-takes-notice/article67647732.ece

Spread the Word