THE CONTEXT: The Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam aim to modernize the legal framework to address contemporary challenges, particularly in handling electronic evidence or e-evidence. Most changes focus on broadening the scope of secondary evidence, clarifying the definitions related to electronic records, and introducing a new requirement for expert certification for the admissibility of electronic evidence.
THE ISSUES:
- Implementation of New Criminal Laws: These laws represent a bold legal overhaul that will tackle contemporary challenges, including those arising from digital and electronic evidence. This transition marks a pivotal shift in the Indian legal landscape and is a decisive step towards a more just and secure society.
- Changes in Electronic Evidence Provisions: The BSA introduces specific changes to the handling and admissibility of electronic evidence. This includes a broader scope for secondary evidence and more precise definitions concerning electronic records, such as emails, server logs, and digital documents. These changes are designed to enhance clarity and efficiency in legal processes involving electronic evidence, reflecting the increasing relevance of digital data in criminal investigations.
- Requirement of Expert Certification: As to the amendments being under the BSA, the requirement to identify the expert certification for which the electronic records are to be admitted may also be found under Section 63(4). This provision mandates that two individuals must sign the certificate: the person who watches the monitor or controls the computer and the authoritative receiver. Through this adaptation, the integrity and reliability of electronic evidence are being prioritized, and the possibility of more demand for expert certification has been identified as a benefit spurred by the increased complexity as well.
- Increased Workload on Cyber Laboratories: The need for expert certification is anticipated to increase cyber labs’ workload significantly. Due to the prevalence of smartphones and the everyday use of digital evidence in criminal investigations, many cyber labs may struggle to cope with the increasing number of requests for expert opinions. This position is further aggravated by the fact that some labs lack resources or are not authorized to provide expert opinions on electronic records, for example, in Chattisgarh.
- Lack of Awareness and Infrastructure Readiness: The enforcement agencies’ poor knowledge of encryption methods and infrastructure readiness requirements is noticeable. The legislation to be operative shortly calls for immediate awareness programs and infrastructure development to set up agencies to handle the requirements of the BSA, especially in terms of the handling and certification of electronic evidence.
- Clarification and Standardization of Definitions: The BSA is aimed at the definition and unification of the concepts concerning electronic evidence, such as documents, primary evidence, and admittance of electronic records. This includes specifying that documents stored in electronic format are considered records of the Authority and that electronic transmission and storage of video recordings become primary evidence.
THE WAY FORWARD:
- Training and Transition Programs: The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) and State governments should develop comprehensive training programs for law enforcement, legal professionals, and judiciary members to familiarize them with the new laws and procedures. Implementing the new rules in phases can help manage the transition smoothly, allowing for adjustments and refinements based on feedback from early adopters.
- Public-Private Partnerships: Increasing the number of trained personnel and upgrading the technological infrastructure of cyber laboratories can help manage the increased workload. Collaborating with private sector experts and companies specializing in digital forensics can provide additional support and resources.
- Awareness Campaigns: Conducting awareness campaigns about the new laws and the importance of encryption and electronic evidence management can help prepare all stakeholders. Enforcement agencies must invest in software and hardware infrastructure to handle electronic evidence.
- Clarification and Standardization of Definitions: Creating comprehensive legal dictionaries that include standardized definitions of terms related to electronic evidence can help avoid ambiguity. Keeping the legal framework updated with technological advancements ensures that definitions and standards remain relevant.
- Adhering to International standards: The Council of Europe’s Committee of Ministers has issued guidelines on electronic evidence in civil and administrative proceedings, emphasizing practical solutions to manage electronic evidence effectively. Electronic evidence should be stored to preserve its readability, accessibility, integrity, authenticity, reliability, and confidentiality. Standardized metadata should be used to ensure the context of its creation is evident. Courts should archive electronic evidence under national law, ensuring the data’s integrity, authenticity, confidentiality, and quality.
THE CONCLUSION:
India’s criminal justice system is being modernized through reforms in the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam and related laws, focused on improving the reliability of electronic evidence in legal proceedings. However, challenges include increased workload on cyber laboratories and the need for infrastructure readiness. Successful implementation will require comprehensive training and standardized procedures to ensure effectiveness in the digital age.
UPSC PAST YEAR QUESTIONS:
Q.1 Discuss different types of cybercrimes and measures to be taken to fight the menace. (2020)
Q.2 Discuss how emerging technologies and globalization contribute to money laundering. Elaborate measures to tackle the problem of money laundering both at national and international levels. (2018)
MAINS PRACTICE QUESTION:
Q.1 The introduction of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, and Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita marks a significant overhaul in India’s criminal justice system, particularly in the handling of electronic evidence. Critically analyze the potential impact of these new laws on India’s internal security framework. Discuss the challenges in their implementation and suggest measures to address these challenges.
SOURCE:
Spread the Word