THE CONTEXT: An MIT electro-encephalography study finds that exclusive LLM use dampens frontal-parietal neural networks, erodes originality and lowers memory recall. A phenomenon labelled as “cognitive debt.” Ethically, the question is not productivity but autonomy of thought, a core determinant of moral agency.
THE DATERMINANTS OF ETHICAL RISK:
| Determinant | GS-IV Link | Illustrative Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Digital Temptation: instant answers induce cognitive laziness. | “Attitude: social influence & persuasion” | 76 % of teachers report students rely on AI tools though only 20 % feel trained to guide them. |
| Asymmetric Access: rural learners lack bandwidth. | “Empathy, Compassion” | 50 % of global learners have no home computer. |
| Opaque Algorithms: hallucinations and hidden biases. | “Accountability & Ethical Governance” | EU AI Act lists education AI as high-risk, mandating transparency. |
| Data Extraction: student prompts become proprietary data. | “Right to Privacy” | India’s Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 imposes fiduciary duties on data processors. |
CONSEQUENCES FOR ETHICS IN PRIVATE & PUBLIC LIFE
-
- Private sphere: Over-delegation may stunt character formation (Aristotelian virtue ethics) by outsourcing the habitual practice of reasoned judgment.
- Public sphere: Civil servants who permit AI to draft cabinet notes risk compromising objectivity and non-partisanship; algorithmic bias can skew welfare targeting, violating distributive justice.
- Societal trust: Edelman Tech-Sector Report 2025 shows a 26-point gap between trust in “tech” (76 %) and trust in AI (50 %), signalling a fragile public mandate.
MULTI-DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS
| DIMENSION | KEY POINTS |
|---|---|
| Human Values | Swaraj (M Gandhi) champions self-rule of the mind; Tagore warns against “mechanised learning.” |
| Attitude Formation | Reliance on AI fosters an external locus of control, weakening moral courage in whistleblowing. |
| Emotional Intelligence | Self-awareness lets users spot cognitive off-loading; empathy demands we ensure AI outputs do not perpetuate stereotypes. |
| Probity & Transparency | Draft AI policies must publish model cards & audit trails; aligns with Right to Information spirit. |
MORAL THINKERS’ INSIGHTS
-
- Immanuel Kant: “Sapere Aude—Dare to think”; over-reliance on AI contradicts the categorical imperative of self-reasoning.
- Swami Vivekananda: Emphasised self-effort (purushartha) over mechanical repetition, pertinent to AI-generated text.
- Confucius: Warned against learning “without thought,” echoing cognitive debt concerns.
THE ISSUES:
-
- Ethical Dilution: LLMs normalise copy-pasted morality devoid of contextual judgment.
- Equity Paradox: Under-served groups either miss AI benefits or become guineapigs for untested ed-tech.
- Regulatory Catch-up: Fragmented oversight between Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology and Ministry of Education delays cohesive norms.
- Detection Arms-Race: Paraphrase bots outpace AI-detectors, leading to false positives that harm honest students.
- Psychological Dependence: Users show withdrawal-type anxiety during global LLM outages – akin to social-media dopamine loops.
- Epistemic Dependence: Over-reliance fosters confirmation bias and susceptibility to AI-generated propaganda, undermining informed citizenship.
- Privacy and Surveillance: Data fed into proprietary LLMs may be repurposed, challenging Right to Privacy (K. S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India, 2017).
THE WAY FORWARD:
| MEASURE | PRESCRIPTION |
|---|---|
| AI-Literacy Mandate | Embed a Critical AI & Ethics module from Class VIII under the National Curriculum Framework 2025. Use project-based learning to practise prompt-engineering and bias-spotting. |
| Disclosure Code | UGC to require a “Made-with-AI” footnote in every assignment, mirroring citation rules, enforced via plagiarism-penalty matrix. |
| Teacher Upskilling Fellowship | Train 10 000 educators annually in AI ethics and instructional design through SWAYAM MOOCs plus in-person residencies. |
| Data Fiduciary Label | Classify student data as sensitive personal data under DPDP Rules; non-compliant vendors lose school procurement eligibility. |
| Inclusive Access Fund | Pool CSR and PM e-Vidya resources to equip 3 000 aspirational-district schools with offline LLM edge devices by 2027. |
| Bharat Trusted AI Seal | Voluntary certification for ed-tech that meets ethics-by-design, transparency, and accessibility standards; boosts export credibility. |
| Public Service Code Update | Department of Personnel & Training to insert an AI-Assisted Decision Protocol requiring civil servants to log prompts and human-override justifications. |
THE CONCLUSION:
Generative Artificial Intelligence is neither a panacea nor a peril; it is a power-tool whose ethical calibration will decide whether it augments or atrophies human intellect. A synergy of cognitive-centric pedagogy, responsible regulation and inclusive access can convert the current “cognitive debt” into a long-term “knowledge dividend.”
UPSC PAST YEAR QUESTION:
Q. The application of Artificial Intelligence as a dependable source of input for administrative rational decision-making is a debatable issue. Critically examine the statement from the ethical point of view. 2024
MAINS PRACTICE QUESTION:
Q. Cognitive off-loading to Artificial-Intelligence tools challenges the very foundations of ethical autonomy and public accountability. Examine
SOURCE:
Spread the Word