THE CONTEXT: The public-interest litigation filed in the Bombay High Court against Prada over its Spring/Summer 2026 sandal modelled on the Geographical Indication–tagged Kolhapuri chappal has rekindled the larger debate on safeguarding India’s artisanal intellectual property in global markets. The Prada–Kolhapuri episode has highlighted a clash between Article 29’s mandate to protect cultural minorities and Article 19(1)(g)’s freedom to trade, underscoring the State’s duty to balance heritage with commerce.
STAKEHOLDER ECOSYSTEM & ECONOMIC VALUE:
-
- Artisan base: Over 10,000 families in Kolhapur and adjoining Karnataka depend directly on the vegetable-tanning leather chain.
- Macro value: Handicraft exports touched ₹30,019 crore in 2023-24 (Export Promotion Council for Handicrafts, IHGF prospectus).
- Digital reach: Indiahandmade, launched April 2023, offers a zero-commission marketplace to 62 lakh weavers and artisans.
- E-commerce momentum: ONDC counts six lakh merchants and targets 30-40 million monthly transactions by March 2025, signalling a highway for GI sellers if on-boarding frictions are removed.
LEGAL–INSTITUTIONAL ARCHITECTURE:
-
- Primary law: Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999; Sections 21-29 grant civil and criminal remedies.
- Territoriality ceiling: Rights stop at India’s border; cross-border cover requires bilateral deals or accession to the Lisbon–Geneva system.
- Police power: Section 50 empowers a Deputy Superintendent of Police or above to seize infringing stock without warrant, but capacity is thin outside metros.
GROUND-LEVEL VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS:
| LAYER | BOTTLENECK | MANIFESTATION ON GROUND |
|---|---|---|
| Registration | Average filing fee ₹5,000 seems low, but documentation costs often breach ₹35,000 for illiterate clusters. | Many clusters (e.g., Malkha cotton) remain unregistered. |
| Enforcement | Only four GI Cells are functional across India. | Counterfeit Kanjeevaram sarees flood Surat markets. |
| Market Linkage | Less than 5 % of GI units sell online. | Middle men retain 60-65 % of retail value in Kolhapur. |
| Finance | MUDRA loans treat GI enterprises as “unsecured retail”. | Working-capital rates hover at 11-14 %. |
CASE STUDIES:
-
- Kolhapuri Chappal: GI (2019) but zero institutional mark-monitoring abroad; Prada iteration exposed gap.
- Kullu Shawl: State-run inspection agency plus QR-tagging slashed counterfeits by 35 % in three years (Himachal Directorate of Industries 2023 report).
- Sanganeri Block Print: 2021 fast-fashion tie-up without attribution; litigation stalled owing to absence of collective legal fund.
THE CHALLENGES:
-
- Fragmented governance: DPIIT registers, Textiles markets, Commerce negotiates treaties — no single nodal authority for enforcement.
- Costly foreign filings: A Lisbon–Geneva application costs ~CHF 1,000 per class — prohibitive for self-help groups.
- Low digital literacy among women artisans; WhatsApp catalogues rarely translate into sales conversions.
- Customs blind spot: Kolkata and Nhava Sheva lack dedicated GI inspection desks; mis-declared goods escape scrutiny.
- Absence of benefit-sharing law: Unlike the Biological Diversity Act’s Section 21, craft clusters receive no statutory royalty when designs earn export premiums.
GOVERNMENT INTERVENTIONS – REALITY CHECK:
| MEASURE | ANNOUNCED | FIELD REALITY |
|---|---|---|
| Indiahandmade portal | 2023 | Only 8,200 active sellers versus 62 lakh potential. |
| ODOP export hubs | 2021 | District export facilitation centres still operate from temporary rooms in 431 of 750 districts. |
| PM-Vishwakarma GI toolkit | Budget 2024 | Guidelines awaited; zero disbursements so far. |
| Bilateral GI list in India–EU FTA | Under negotiation | EU insists on homonymous names exclusion; talks slowed. |
THE WAY FORWARD:
-
- District GI Facilitation Desks: House them within existing District Industries Centres to avoid fresh infrastructure. Train two patent examiners per state under IP India’s budget line; use CSR funds for stipends. Target 100 new GI applications and 400 renewals by 2027.
- Artisan-owned ONDC pods: Leverage the ₹277-crore ONDC support outlay to waive catalogue-upload fees for self-help groups in ten craft clusters. Integrate local language voice-to-text modules to cut digital literacy barriers. Measure success by monthly order value rather than seller count.
- QR-NFC provenance tags under BIS standard: Bureau of Indian Standards can notify a low-cost tag (₹1 per piece at scale). Pilot on Kolhapuri footwear with Maharashtra Leather Industries cluster; link to IP India database for real-time verification. Customs to scan tags at export gateways, curbing mis-declaration.
- Heritage Legal Aid Corpus: Channel 1 % of EPCH export proceeds into a professionally managed litigation fund. Cap legal aid at ₹25 lakh per case, releasing amounts against audited bills. First use-case; defending Sanganeri artisans in EU trademark court.
- Lisbon–Geneva targeted accession: Accede only for 25 high-export GIs (tea, coffee, handloom icons) to contain cost. Commerce Ministry can route fees through Market Access Initiative Scheme. This yields near-automatic cover in 25 member economies within one year.
- Cluster-level Common Facility Centres (CFCs): Repurpose existing MSME tool-rooms for stamping, finishing and eco-leather treatment. Shared machinery reduces per-unit cost by 18 % (SIDBI pilot, Ranipet). Finance via 70 % central grant and 30 % producer cooperative equity.
THE CONCLUSION:
When a Kolhapuri design walks the Milan runway, the question is not whether India should share its heritage with the world, but whether the custodians of that heritage get their rightful credit and share of value. A calibrated mix of legal tightening, digital innovation and community-centric benefit-sharing can convert cultural appropriation into ethical collaboration, turning every Kolhapuri step abroad into a stride towards inclusive prosperity at home.
UPSC PAST YEAR QUESTION:
Q. In a globalised world, intellectual property rights assume significance and are a source of litigation. Broadly distinguish between the terms – copyrights, patents and trade secrets. 2014
MAINS PRACTICE QUESTION:
Q. Territorial limits and procedural costs have rendered India’s Geographical Indication regime a paper tiger abroad. Examine this statement in light of the Kolhapuri chappal controversy.
SOURCE:
Spread the Word