About:
-
- These are non-judicial entities with same power as courts.
- They resolve disputes, enforce laws, and issue punishments within their jurisdiction.
- These are led by experts rather than judges.
- Governed by the principles of natural justice.
Difference between judicial and quasi-judicial bodies
| Aspect | Judicial Bodies | Quasi-Judicial Bodies |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Formal courts with constitutional authority to interpret and enforce laws. | Non-judicial entities with limited authority to resolve disputes and enforce laws in specific areas. |
| Headed By | Judges | Experts |
| Jurisdiction | Broad, covering all legal matters. | Limited to specific areas like consumer rights, corporate governance, environment, etc. |
| Nature of Authority | Absolute | Subject to judicial review |
| Procedure | Strict procedures, formal trials, and adherence to legal technicalities. | Less formal, quicker proceedings, and reduced legal complexities |
| Example | Supreme Court, High Courts, District Courts. | National Green Tribunal, Consumer Courts, Company Law Appellate Tribunal. |
Advantages
-
- Cost-effective & hassle-free
- Reduces judicial workload
- Speedy justice
Challenges
-
- Limited manpower
- Frequent appeals
- False cases
- Lack of uniformity
Way forward
-
- Standardized procedures
- Case screening and clear appeal guidelines
- Improve case management systems
- Conduct regular audits for performance assessment
