THE CONTEXT: Digital public‑infrastructure, affordable data and Production‑Linked Incentive (PLI) schemes have made India the world’s third‑largest generator of electronic waste after China and the United States; output touched 1.7 million t in 2023‑24, up from 0.71 million t in 2017‑18 (≈151 percent in six years). The Global E‑waste Monitor 2024 warns that worldwide volumes will rise another 35 percent by 2030 while documented recycling rates could slide to 20 percent—a trajectory that will amplify India’s domestic pressures.
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK:
| Principle | Relevance to E waste |
|---|---|
| Polluter Pays Principle | Internalises the environmental externalities of discarded electronics through fees and compliance costs. |
| Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) | Shifts the onus of end of life management to manufacturers, importers and brand owners. |
| Circular Economy Paradigm | Promotes “design for disassembly”, secondary raw material markets and zero landfill loops, as endorsed by NITI Aayog’s Circular Economy Action Plans. |
INDIAN POLICY ARCHITECTURE:
| Instrument | Salient Provisions | Critical Gaps |
|---|---|---|
| E Waste (Management) Rules, 2022 | Mandatory EPR targets; online registration; prohibition on unregistered entities. | Enforcement capacity uneven across States; informal sector largely outside the compliance net. |
| 2024 Amendment & CPCB Guidelines | Floor price for EPR certificates (≥ 30 percent of calculated environmental compensation cost) to guarantee recycler viability; an electronic marketplace for certificate trade. | Lack of cost indexation formula; no clarity on periodic revision; dispute mechanism nascent. |
| Green Credit Programme (2023) | Credits for circular economy actions, including e waste recycling. | Yet to be dovetailed with EPR portal for seamless accounting. |
WHY THE FLOOR‑PRICE DEBATE MATTERS:
-
- Market‑failure Correction – Registered recyclers operate with higher capital and compliance costs than informal aggregators; a floor price neutralises this disadvantage and makes formal recovery financially attractive.
- Risk of “Search‑and‑Destroy” Pricing – Without a floor, certificate prices can crash—as seen in early plastic‑waste markets—triggering sham recyclers and regulatory arbitrage.
- Legal Pushback – Multinationals such as Samsung, Daikin and Hitachi have challenged the “one‑size‑fits‑all” floor, arguing that it inflates compliance costs three‑ to four‑fold and may cascade to consumers. A calibrated approach balancing environmental integrity and industrial competitiveness is therefore essential.
MULTI‑DIMENSIONAL CHALLENGES:
| Dimension | Illustrative Evidence |
|---|---|
| Environmental | Cyanide based leaching, acid bath stripping and open wire burning release lead, mercury and dioxins into air soil water matrices, undermining SDG 3 (Good Health) and SDG 6 (Clean Water). |
| Economic | ≈ ₹80,000 crore of recoverable metals (gold, copper, palladium) lost annually due to rudimentary techniques, while tax leakages exceed ₹1.6 trillion because transactions remain cash based and invisible to GST. |
| Social -Occupational | Informal clusters at Seelampur (Delhi) or Moradabad (Uttar Pradesh) employ child and female labour; studies peg average life expectancy at < 27 years due to heavy metal exposure. |
| Governance | Only 43 percent of e waste reached formal recycling channels in 2023 24 despite an EPR portal and QR based tracking. Data reconciliation between State Pollution Control Boards, Customs and GSTN is poor. |
| Technical | Low domestic capacity for high value fractionation (printed circuit board smelting) compels export of concentrates, raising questions on Basel Convention compliance. |
GOVERNANCE IMPLICATIONS:
-
- Cooperative Federalism: Article 256 can empower the Centre to issue directions, but on‑ground enforcement rests with States; capacity‑building grants under the 16th Finance Commission should earmark funds for e‑waste squads.
- Fiscal Federalism: A “Green GST” credit could offset part of verified recycling expenditure, incentivising compliance without distorting consumer prices.
- Data‑for‑Development: Linking the EPR portal with the FASTag‑like “E‑Waste Pass” for cross‑State transport would curb leakages.
THE WAY FORWARD:
| Pillar | Actionables | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Dynamic Floor Price Formula | Peg minimum certificate price to London Metal Exchange (LME) composite basket plus verified processing cost index; annual revision by CPCB. | Keeps recyclers solvent yet prevents rent seeking; addresses industry’s volatility concern. |
| Informal Sector Mainstreaming | Issue “Pro Recycler” micro certificates after 30 hour skilling module; enable Self Help Groups to aggregate e waste for registered facilities. | Preserves livelihoods, improves traceability and occupational safety. |
| Infrastructure & Technology | Establish four Regional Urban Mining Parks with concessional land and concessional power tariff; mandate Best Available Techniques such as hydrometallurgical copper extraction and reverse logistics analytics. | Economies of scale cut unit costs; technology leapfrog recovers strategic metals for electronics and renewable energy supply chains. |
| Consumer side Nudges | Integrate E waste Take back Score into the Bureau of Energy Efficiency star label; allow income tax deduction for certified returns > ₹1,000 a year. | Aligns household behaviour with circular economy goals. |
| Compliance & Deterrence | Fast track environmental compensation adjudication via the National Green Tribunal; publish a quarterly “Producer Compliance Index”; block non compliant imports at Customs electronic data interchange. | Enhances transparency and creates reputational stakes. |
| Research & Development Fund | Levy 2 percent of EPR corpus into a National Critical Metals Recovery Fund administered by CSIR and IIT Madras to indigenise rare earth separation technology. | Secures strategic autonomy and feeds Make in India ambitions. |
THE CONCLUSION:
The floor‑price mechanism, though contested, is a pivotal instrument to tilt the economics of e‑waste from extraction to regeneration. A dynamic, evidence‑based floor price, integrated informal sector, and technology‑rich recycling clusters can convert the present liability into a ₹ 50,000 crore urban‑mining opportunity. For the Union and the States, the agenda is clear: translate principles into practice, enforce with empathy, and lead the Global South in circular‑economy governance.
UPSC PAST YEAR QUESTION:
Q. What are the impediments in disposing the huge quantities of discarded solid wastes which are continuously being generated? How do we remove safely the toxic wastes that have been accumulating in our habitable environment? 2018
MAINS PRACTICE QUESTION:
Q. Critically evaluate the role of EPR floor pricing in formalising India’s e-waste sector. Suggest reforms to make e-waste management economically viable and environmentally sustainable.
SOURCE:
Spread the Word