PRADHAN MANTRI AWAS YOJNA (URBAN)

Objective:

    • It was launched in 2015 with objective of ‘Housing for all’.
    • To promote sustainable and affordable housing.

Features:

    • It works on demand driven approach i.e. need for housing is based on demand assessment by state/Uts.
    • Time period: Initially it was seven years from FY 2015-16 to FY 2021-22. Now it has been extended upto 31st December 2024 with all verticals except Credit Linked Subsidy Scheme (CLSS), for competition of already sanctioned houses till 31st March 2022.
    • The scheme is divided in 4 verticals:

 

In-situ Slum Redevelopment (ISSR)Credit Linked Subsidy Scheme (CLSS)Affordable Housing in Partnership (AHP)Beneficiary led construction (BLC)
• It is centrally sponsored.• It is a central sector scheme.• It is a centrally sponsored scheme.• It is centrally sponsored.
• Slum rehabilitation of slum dwellers by private participation, considering land as a resource.• Assistance provided to eligible beneficiaries of EWS/LIG and MIG on home loans from banks.• Assistance provided to families who don’t have land.• Assistance to eligible beneficiaries belonging to EWS category.
• Assistance to families belonging to EWS categories.• Aims to promote affordable housing.• Based on supply side intervention.• Based on demand side intervention.
• It is demand driven.• It is demand driven.

 

    • It promotes women empowerment by providing ownership of houses in the name of female member or joint.
    • A robust and comprehensive MIS system – CLSS Awas Portal (CLAP) is put in place which enables all stakeholders to seamlessly manage information pertaining to physical and financial progress.
    • 5% of total allocation under the scheme is earmarked for capacity building, Information Education & Communication (IEC) and Administrative & Other Expenses (A&OE).
    • All houses under PMAY will have basic amenities like toilet, water supply, kitchen, electricity.
    • Affordable Rental Housing Complex (ARHC):
      • A sub-scheme under PMAY-urban.
      • It aims to provide ease of living to urban migrants/poor in industrial sector as well as non-formal economy to get access to affordable and dignified rental housing near their workplace.

Progress:

    • Of total 118.64 lakhs houses sanctioned, 82.16 lakhs houses are completed.

Critical observations by Parliamentary Standing Committee:

    • Gap in housing demand assessment: the actual demand for housing under the scheme is 1.23 crore as against the initial estimation of 2 crores.
    • Lack of basic amenities: It further causes delay as noted by committee that as of December 2022, 5.6 lakh houses were not delivered to beneficiaries due to lack of basic services.
    • Timeline for grounding and completion: Of total 123 lakh sanctioned houses, 107 lakh houses (87%) have been grounded till December 2022 and 61 lakh houses have been delivered to beneficiaries.
    • It is even worse in Northeast states mainly due to geographical and economic reasons, where less than 50% of sanctioned houses are completed till October 2022.
    • High-cost burden on beneficiary: some states like Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur and Rajasthan are reluctant to provide their contribution. As a result, the average beneficiary contribution goes as high as 60%.
    • Overemphasis on BLC vertical: 60% of total 123 lakh houses sanctioned belong to BLC vertical. This dilutes the objective of scheme.
    • Lower sanctioning under ISSR vertical: Only 4.33 lakh (30%) houses are sanctioned as against the demand of 14.35 lakhs.

Suggestions by the committee:

    • The ministry should specify strict timelines for starting and completion of house construction.
    • The central assistance provided to states should not be fixed rather vary according to state’s topography.
    • The ministry should conduct impact assessment of the scheme and proceed with the necessary changes.
    • Ensuring land availability, statutory clearances and clearing of slums to enable smooth construction process.
    • Outcome based approach rather than output based i.e. focus on number of houses actually occupied by beneficiaries rather than just focusing on number of houses complete.
Spread the Word
Index