Most ethical approach to criminal punishment: Rehabilitation or Retribution

(Should society focus on punishment or on addressing the root causes of criminal behavior)

The criminal justice system, while foundational to societal order, is fraught with outdated practices and inherent flaws that raise ethical concerns, such as the punishment of innocent people. The famous legal maxim “It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer,” perfectly highlights the dilemma faced by modern justice systems striving to balance deterrence, reformation and the risk of unjust punishment.
Rehabilitation is reforming the offender to prevent future crimes with an objective to reintegrate them into the society. Retribution on the other hand is punishing the offender in proportion to their crime. Punishment serves a dual purpose: deterrence and reformation. It acts as a deterrent by instilling fear of consequences, while simultaneously aiming to rehabilitate offenders.

Ethical arguments for both

RehabilitationRetribution
Human Dignity: Recognizes the potential for change and respects the inherent worth of individuals.Moral Accountability: Affirms the moral agency of individuals and the importance of consequences for wrongful actions.
Reduces recurrence of criminal behavior:
Aims to lower the likelihood of reoffending, thereby enhancing public safety.
Deterrence: It publicly denounces criminal behavior & discourages others from committing similar acts by creating a fear of consequences.
Restorative Justice: Promotes healing for victims and communities through restorative practices that involve offenders taking responsibility and making amends.Justice for Victims: Provides a sense of closure and justice for victims and their families by acknowledging their suffering and the wrong done to them. Also, it upholds the rule of law and societal norms.
Example:
Scandinavian prisons are different from many others across the globe. The system focuses on rehabilitating prisoners. Here ‘open’ prisons are the norm, where prisoners can commute to a town without escorts or unnecessary rules, can use sharp utensils and complete university degrees.
Example:
Criminal law punishments in Saudi Arabia include public beheading, stoning, amputation and lashing. Serious criminal offences include not only internationally recognized crimes such as murder, rape, theft and robbery, but also apostasy, adultery, witchcraft and sorcery.

An effective criminal justice system should prioritize rehabilitation alongside retribution. Life imprisonment itself is a severe punishment, and in extreme cases, the principle of proportionality, as discussed by Immanuel Kant, justifies the death penalty.
A combined approach creates a more balanced and humane criminal justice system. This approach can be seen as ethical for several reasons:

    • Tailored Sentencing: Allows for sentences that are tailored to the nature of the crime and the needs of the offender, potentially combining punitive measures with opportunities for rehabilitation.
    • Holistic Justice: Seeks to address not only the act of crime but also its underlying causes, aiming for long-term solutions rather than short-term punishment.
    • Societal Benefit: Balances the need for public safety and moral accountability with the potential benefits of rehabilitating offenders, ultimately contributing to a more just and stable society.

Punishment / Addressing Root cause of the problem

    • The concept of rehabilitation is based on the understanding that criminal behavior often arises from a variety of factors, both external and internal, such as a traumatic childhood, lack of parental love, antisocial values, insecurity, and lack of supervision. These factors suggest that crime is not merely a product of “free will” but rather a result of complex influences that drive individuals towards unlawful acts. This perspective implies that addressing these underlying factors through rehabilitation could be more effective than purely punitive measures.
    • Also, there is a growing consensus on the need to shift the focus of punishment from punitive to rehabilitative approaches. This transition from a “nothing works” mindset to a “what works” approach aims to help offenders reintegrate into society successfully, reducing the likelihood of reoffending.
    • The Indian Penal Code, 1860, prescribes only five types of punishment: death, life imprisonment, rigorous or simple imprisonment, forfeiture, and fines. However, the reformative view among penologists suggests that punishment should not just settle old scores but should also focus on preventing future crimes. The end goal of rehabilitation is to prevent the recurrence of criminal behavior and to understand the root causes that lead to crime, allowing for corrective measures to be implemented.
    • Focusing on addressing the root causes of criminal behavior is an ethical approach which aims to prevent crime before it occurs. This approach includes:
    • Social and Economic Policies: Implementing policies that reduce poverty, improve education, and create economic opportunities.
    • Mental Health and Addiction Services: Providing access to mental health care and addiction treatment to address issues that may lead to criminal behavior.
    • Community Engagement: Building strong community networks and support systems that can intervene before individuals turn to crime.

While punitive measures may be necessary to deter crime in the short term and ensure justice, incorporating rehabilitative and reformative strategies can address the root causes of criminal behavior in the long term & support the reintegration of offenders into society, and ultimately reduce recidivism. Though addressing the root causes of crime, such as poverty, lack of education, and social inequality are complex and time-consuming, it is crucial. This balanced approach aligns with the evolving understanding of justice, emphasizing the potential for positive change and the importance of addressing the broader social factors that contribute to crime. This approach aligns with Mahatma Gandhi’s philosophy: “Hate the sin, not the sinner.”

To put people behind walls or bars and do little or nothing to change them is to win a battle but to lose a war. It’s wrong. It’s stupid. It’s expensive.” - Warren Burger.

Role of Ethics: Ethics plays a critical role in the criminal justice system guiding the principles behind laws and their application. Laws often lag behind ethical standards leading to injustices. Ethical considerations highlight the need for a justice system that evolves and adapts to contemporary values. Injustice, if perpetuated by outdated laws, breeds further crime and societal unrest. Indian laws are outdated/colonial and require modernization to align with contemporary needs.

Spread the Word
Index