Answer:
APPROACH AND STRUCTURE
THE INTRODUCTION: Brief intro about recent RTI amendment Act 2019.
THE BODY
-
- List the recent amendments.
- Explain how these changes will impact on the autonomy and independence of the Information Commission.
THE CONCLUSION: Conclude with need to protect independence of the institution and strengthening the law.
THE INTRODUCTION:
The Right to Information (Amendment) Act, 2019, gave the Centre the powers to set the salaries and service conditions of information commissioners at the central and state levels. There are concerns that it will compromise the autonomy and independence of the Information Commissions.
THE BODY:
Provision |
RTI Act, 2005 |
RTI (Amendment) Act, 2019 |
1. Term |
|
|
2. Quantum of Salary |
|
|
The government has come up with the amendment to RTI Act in accordance with the Law Commission recommendation that there should be synchronization of all statutory bodies in terms of process of appointments, tenure and service conditions so as to bring uniformity among them.
There are standard criteria even in the Constitution to ensure independence of institutions such as:
-
-
- Clear definition of tenure
- Stability of tenure
- Defined service conditions
- Financial independence
-
Now through RTI Amendment Act, these criteria are not fixed and will be decided by the central government. Hence, it is being said that amendment will severely dilute the independence of Information Commissions. E.g. it is well established practice that these should be long & secure tenure, remuneration should be charged upon Consolidated fund of India recommended by reforms commissions in the past.
Already Information Commissions are struggling with many problems such as large number of vacancies due to delay in appointments, huge backlog of cases (According to National Campaign for People’s Right to Information report 2019-20, nearly 32,000 appeal cases are pending with Central Information Commission, more than 25% of state information commissioners’ positions lay vacant in 2018), lack of budgetary support.
Despite of such constraints, they have played very instrumental role in last 15 years of their working in promotion of transparency and accountability. E.g. efforts of CIC led to Supreme Court declaring that SC will come under RTI (SC in CPIO Vs Subhash Chandra Agrawal case 2019).
THE CONCLUSION:
Although it is prerogative of the executive to determine how government machinery should be run but at the same time, it should ensure that institutions which uphold accountability remain independent and empowered rather than disempowered.
Spread the Word