THE CONTEXT: A Roadmap to 2025, adopted at the 15th EU-India Summit in July 2020, outlines a comprehensive plan to strengthen cooperation between the two entities over five years. This roadmap is nearing its conclusion, and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has announced plans to visit India to “upgrade the strategic partnership” during her second term.
THE BACKGROUND:
-
- Institutional Framework: 15 India-EU Summits held since 2004, providing a regular platform for high-level dialogue. Adoption of “India-EU Strategic Partnership: A Roadmap to 2025” at the 15th Summit in July 2020, outlining a comprehensive plan for cooperation.
- Economic Ties: EU re-emerged as India’s largest trading partner in 2023, with bilateral trade in goods reaching €124 billion (12.2% of India’s total trade). Trade in services reached €50.8 billion in 2023, up from €30.4 billion in 2020. EU’s FDI stock in India reached €108.3 billion in 2022, though still below investments in China (€247.5 billion) or Brazil (€293.4 billion).
- Strategic Convergence: Shared commitment to rules-based international order, effective multilateralism, and sustainable development. Growing alignment on Indo-Pacific strategy and connectivity initiatives.
- Recent Developments: European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen’s announcement to visit India as the first overseas stop of her second term, signaling prioritization of the partnership. Postponement of the bilateral summit to early 2025, offering an opportunity to recalibrate the relationship post-elections in both entities.
CHALLENGES AND DIFFERENCES:
| Category |
India |
EU |
Implications for Partnership |
| Political Org. |
Sovereign nation-state, centralized decision-making |
Supranational entity (27 member states), consensus-based |
Impacts agility & coherence; EU struggles with internal divisions (e.g., UNSC reform). |
| Security Paradigms |
Strategic autonomy, self-reliance in defense |
Collective security via NATO, transatlantic partnership |
Affects collaboration on global security; differing stances on conflicts (e.g., Russia-Ukraine). |
| Global Aspirations |
Emerging power, seeks to reshape global governance |
Established power, aims to maintain influence in multipolar world |
Differing approaches to international institutions; India advocates for reform, EU seeks to preserve influence. |
| Int’l Relations |
Balances soft power with hard power |
Emphasis on normative power, economic diplomacy |
Impacts engagement with other powers (e.g., India’s partnerships with Russia & US vs. EU’s value-based policy). |
| Economic Priorities |
Development, job creation, poverty alleviation |
Sustainability, digital transformation, competitiveness |
Challenges in FTA negotiations (labor standards, environmental regulations). |
| Regulatory F’work |
Evolving environment, focus on self-reliance |
Established, stringent standards (data protection, environment) |
Impedes progress on BTIA; differences in regulatory approaches. |
| Human Rights/Dem. |
Emphasis on sovereignty, non-interference |
Proactive stance on human rights globally |
Occasional tensions; EU raises concerns about India’s human rights record. |
| Climate Change |
Balancing development needs with climate commitments |
Leading global climate action, ambitious targets |
Differing capacities & historical responsibilities; challenges in aligning approaches. |
| Tech Cooperation |
Seeking technology transfer, indigenous development |
Protecting intellectual property rights, maintaining tech edge |
Implications for defense & renewable energy cooperation. |
| Regional Dynamics |
Key player in South Asia & Indian Ocean |
Limited direct influence in Asia, growing Indo-Pacific strategy |
EU’s engagement with China & Indo-Pacific strategy presents opportunities & challenges for alignment with India. |
AREAS FOR ENHANCED COOPERATION:
| Area |
Key Initiatives and Opportunities |
Challenges and Recommendations |
| Climate Change and Energy |
|
|
| Social Issues |
|
|
| Trade and Investment |
|
|
| Research & Development (R&D) |
|
|
| Digital Economy & Technology |
|
|
THE WAY FORWARD:
-
- Institutionalizing Strategic Dialogue: Establish a permanent India-EU Strategic Dialogue Mechanism, modeled on the India-US 2+2 Ministerial Dialogue, to address bilateral, regional, and global issues. The success of the India-EU Trade and Technology Council (TTC) in advancing cooperation on digital transformation and resilient supply chains highlights the need for institutionalized frameworks.
- Balancing Normative and Realistic Approaches: Promote a balanced approach where normative values (e.g., democracy, human rights) coexist with pragmatic considerations (e.g., trade, technology transfer). The EU’s proactive engagement with China despite ideological differences demonstrates the effectiveness of realism in foreign policy. It will facilitate smoother negotiations on the stalled Free Trade Agreement (FTA).
- Enhancing Economic and Trade Cooperation: Finalize the long-pending FTA and Investment Protection Agreement (IPA) by addressing non-tariff barriers and regulatory hurdles. Bilateral trade in goods reached €124 billion in 2023, but untapped potential exists in services, biotechnology, nanotechnology, and green technology. Expanding trade to include emerging sectors like AI and quantum computing will future-proof economic ties.
- Strengthening Climate Action and Energy Security: Launch an “India-EU Green Partnership” to co-develop affordable renewable energy technologies and finance climate adaptation projects. The EU’s €1.4 billion investment in Indian renewable energy projects underscores the potential for deeper collaboration. Joint efforts can align with global goals like net-zero emissions by 2050.
- Deepening Security Cooperation: Expand maritime security collaboration under initiatives like CRIMARIO II (Critical Maritime Routes in Indo-Pacific) to include joint naval exercises and intelligence sharing. Enhanced maritime cooperation can counterbalance China’s assertiveness in the Indo-Pacific.
- Leveraging People-to-People Ties: Expand academic exchanges under programs like Erasmus+ and create a flexible visa regime for skilled professionals. Enhanced mobility will support innovation ecosystems in both regions.
THE CONCLUSION:
The India-EU partnership, built on shared values, must focus on balancing strategic autonomy with collaboration in trade, technology, and sustainability to shape a resilient multipolar world. Pragmatic trust-building and deeper cooperation can make it a key pillar of global governance.
UPSC PAST YEAR QUESTION:
Q. The expansion and strengthening of NATO and a stronger US-Europe strategic partnership works well for India.” What is your opinion about this statement? Give reasons and examples to support your answer. 2023
MAINS PRACTICE QUESTION:
Q. Examine the evolving dynamics of the India-EU strategic partnership with a focus on their shared values, economic ties, and security cooperation.
SOURCE:
Spread the Word