Table of Contents
THE CONTEXT: The role of the Leader of the Opposition (LoP) in the Indian Parliament is pivotal, both legally and politically. Defined by the Salary and Allowances of Leaders of Opposition in Parliament Act, 1977, the LoP is the leader of the largest opposition party recognized by the Speaker. Though fraught with challenges, this position is crucial for maintaining a balanced and effective parliamentary democracy.
THE ISSUES:
- Recognition and Categorisation of Parliamentary Parties: The initial direction for recognizing and categorizing parliamentary parties was aimed at providing certain facilities in Parliament but did not address the recognition of the LoP. The Salary and Allowances of Leaders of Opposition in Parliament Act, 1977 later defined the term LoP and set conditions for recognition, including the requirement that the opposition party must have at least 10% of the House’s strength to be recognized by the Speaker.
- Impact of the 10th Schedule: The enactment of the 10th Schedule, which does not recognize the term ‘group’ and considers all political entities as ‘parties,’ has rendered the earlier categorization by the Speaker/Chairman irrelevant. This suggests a need for amendments to the Leaders of Opposition Act to align with the 10th Schedule, allowing the largest opposition party to claim the LoP post regardless of size.
- Political Significance of the LoP in the Westminster System: The LoP in the Lok Sabha holds significant political importance, akin to the “Prime Minister-in-waiting” in the British parliamentary tradition. The LoP forms a shadow cabinet to scrutinize government policies and offer alternatives, although this practice is not followed in India.
- Challenges Faced by the LoP: The LoP’s role is challenging due to its lack of power and the need to unify a diverse opposition. The opposition’s primary role is to oppose, criticize, and seek to replace the government. The recent increase in opposition strength in the Lok Sabha has boosted morale and influence, potentially impacting parliamentary proceedings and debates.
- Historical Traditions and Lessons: Historical practices, such as those established by Jawaharlal Nehru, emphasized the importance of the Prime Minister’s presence during Question Hour and the need for the government to listen to the opposition. These traditions highlight the value of dissent and the role of the LoP in strengthening democracy.
- Current Political Context and Responsibilities: The 2024 general election has significantly changed the political landscape, with a more substantial opposition presence in the Lok Sabha. The current LoP, Rahul Gandhi, is responsible for unifying the opposition, holding the government accountable, and ensuring democratic debate. The LoP’s role includes participating in key appointments and influencing parliamentary committees.
THE WAY FORWARD:
- Amend the Salary and Allowances of Leaders of Opposition in Parliament Act, 1977: Amend the 1977 Act to remove the 10% seat requirement. This would allow the largest opposition party, regardless of size, to have its leader recognized as the LoP. This change would align with the provisions of the 10th Schedule, which does not distinguish between parties and groups based on their size.
- Institutionalize the Shadow Cabinet System: In Indian parliamentary practice, the LoP should institutionalize the shadow cabinet system. This would involve appointing shadow ministers who would mirror the roles of government ministers, thereby enhancing the opposition’s ability to provide alternative policies and hold the government accountable.
- Enhance Parliamentary Oversight and Debate: Strengthen parliamentary oversight mechanisms by ensuring that a higher percentage of bills are referred to standing committees for detailed scrutiny. Additionally, ensure that the LoP and other opposition members are given adequate time and opportunity to participate in debates and question government policies.
- Promote Pre-Legislative Consultations: Mandate pre-legislative consultations with the opposition on significant bills. This would improve the quality of legislation and ensure that diverse viewpoints are considered. It would also foster a more collaborative and less confrontational parliamentary environment.
- Strengthen the Role of the LoP in Key Appointments: Ensure that the LoP is an integral part of all major selection committees for constitutional and statutory bodies, such as the Central Vigilance Commission, the Central Information Commission, and the National Human Rights Commission. This would enhance the transparency and accountability of these appointments and ensure that the opposition has a meaningful role in the governance process.
THE CONCLUSION:
The 2024 general election has revitalized the opposition in the Lok Sabha, presenting a unique opportunity for the Leader of the Opposition to influence parliamentary proceedings significantly. By embracing the traditions of open communication and constructive criticism, the LoP can play a vital role in strengthening India’s democratic framework and ensuring the government remains accountable.
UPSC PAST YEAR QUESTIONS:
Q. Individual Parliamentarians’ role as national lawmakers is declining, which, in turn, has adversely impacted the quality of debates and their outcomes. Discuss 2019
Q. The ‘Powers, Privileges and Immunities of Parliament and its Members’ envisaged in Article 105 of the Constitution leave room for many un-codified and un-enumerated privileges to continue. Assess the reasons for the absence of legal codification of the ‘parliamentary privileges. How can this problem be addressed? 2014
MAINS PRACTICE QUESTION:
Q. The role of the Leader of the Opposition (LoP) in the Indian Parliament has evolved significantly since its statutory recognition in 1977. Discuss the historical context, current challenges, and potential reforms needed to enhance the effectiveness of the LoP in the Indian parliamentary system. How does the role of the LoP in India compare with that in the Westminster system?
SOURCE:
Spread the Word