THE CONTEXT: The recent visits of Russian President Vladimir Putin to North Korea and Vietnam, coupled with the upcoming U.S. presidential debate between Joe Biden and Donald Trump, underscore the intricate and evolving interconnections between European and Asian security landscapes. These developments present new strategic opportunities for middle powers like India, which can leverage the shifting dynamics to enhance its geopolitical influence and defense capabilities.
THE ISSUES:
- Historical Context: During the colonial era, Asian resources significantly influenced European imperial powers’ economic and geopolitical trajectories. Indian military resources, for instance, reinforced British dominance in the Indian Ocean and contributed to the military successes of Britain and its allies in both World Wars.
- Contemporary Dynamics: Unlike when European powers made decisions on using colonial resources, Asian states now have the agency to shape the balance of power in Europe. Both Russia and Western Europe are actively courting Asia to influence the narrative on the war in Ukraine. The recent Ukraine peace conference aimed to garner political empathy and diplomatic support from the non-Western world, while Russia urged key Global South nations to avoid attending the meeting.
- Putin’s Visits: Putin’s visits to North Korea and Vietnam illustrate the growing agency of Asian states in dealing with major powers. Russia is eager to rebuild ties with North Korea, signing a treaty on mutual security assistance. This move challenges the West and enhances North Korea’s strategic maneuverability between China, Japan, South Korea, and the U.S.
- Vietnam’s Strategic Balancing: Vietnam’s decision to host Putin and previous visits from Joe Biden and Xi Jinping showcase its strategic balancing act. Vietnam is expanding economic ties with China and the U.S. while exploring security cooperation with Washington. Renewing strategic ties with Russia is seen as improving its balancing act between major powers.
- S. Foreign Policy Debate: The U.S. faces a significant dilemma in balancing its strategic priorities between Europe and Asia. While the Biden Administration acknowledges China as the principal challenge, it remains committed to supporting Ukraine. This debate will likely be a focal point in the upcoming presidential debate between Biden and Trump.
- European Defense Responsibilities: Both Biden and Trump agree that Europe should take greater responsibility for its defense. The U.S. encourages Eurasian nations to balance Russia and China more, relieving some of America’s burdens. However, despite deep economic interconnections with China, Europe remains divided on addressing the China challenge.
- India’s Strategic Window: The growing interdependence of European and Asian theaters presents new opportunities for middle powers like India. The U.S. hopes to build robust security partnerships with middle powers to balance China and Russia. This allows India to enhance its national power, including military capabilities. However, the Indian bureaucracy must swiftly modernize its defense industrial base and expand arms production to seize these international opportunities.
- Integrated Deterrence: The U.S. emphasis on “integrated deterrence” provides middle powers with unprecedented opportunities to enhance their strategic autonomy. This involves self-sufficiency in arms production and the rapid expansion of domestic arms manufacturing capabilities.
THE WAY FORWARD:
- Strengthening Multilateral Alliances: The growing ties between Russia and North Korea and the strategic balancing by countries like Vietnam underscore the need for robust multilateral alliances. Strengthening alliances such as the Quad (Australia, India, Japan, and the US) and fostering deeper cooperation with ASEAN can counterbalance the Russia-China-North Korea axis.
- Enhancing Defense Capabilities and Self-Sufficiency: It emphasizes the importance of countries like Vietnam and India enhancing their defense capabilities and achieving self-sufficiency in arms production. This reduces dependency on external powers and strengthens national security.
- Diplomatic Engagement and Strategic Balancing: While highlighting Vietnam’s “bamboo diplomacy” model for balancing relations with major powers. By maintaining neutrality and engaging with all significant players, countries can navigate complex geopolitical landscapes without aligning too closely with any single power. It suggests that countries like India should leverage their strategic autonomy to engage diplomatically with Western and non-Western powers. This approach can help mediate conflicts and contribute to regional stability.
- Economic Diversification and Trade Partnerships: Economic diversification is needed to reduce reliance on any single country. Strengthening trade partnerships with various nations can provide economic resilience and strategic leverage.
- Integrated Deterrence and Collective Security: Advocating for integrated deterrence strategies that involve close cooperation between the US and its Asian allies. This includes joint military exercises, intelligence sharing, and coordinated responses to security threats. Supports the concept of collective security arrangements where middle powers like India play a crucial role in regional defense initiatives. This can help distribute the security burden and enhance overall stability in Eurasia.
THE CONCLUSION:
As the geopolitical landscape across Eurasia continues to evolve, middle powers such as India have a unique window of opportunity to bolster their strategic autonomy and defense capabilities. The challenge lies in whether India can swiftly capitalize on these international developments to modernize its defense industrial base and expand arms production, thereby securing a more influential role in the global order.
UPSC PAST YEAR QUESTIONS:
Q.1 The expansion and strengthening of NATO and a stronger US-Europe strategic partnership works well for India.” What is your opinion about this statement? Give reasons and examples to support your answer. 2023
Q.2 ‘’The USA is facing an existential threat in the form of a China, that is much more challenging than the erstwhile Soviet Union.” Explain. 2021
Q.3 What is the significance of Indo-US defense deals over Indo-Russian defense deals? Discuss concerning stability in the Indo-Pacific region. 2020
Q.4 The time has come for India and Japan to build a contemporary solid relationship involving a global and strategic partnership that will have great significance for Asia and the world.’ Comment. 2019
Q.5 What introduces friction between India and the United States is that Washington can still not find a position in India’s global strategy that would satisfy India’s national self-esteem and ambitions.” Explain with suitable examples. 2019
MAINS PRACTICE QUESTION:
Q.1 Discuss the four dimensions of the new “Eurasian” geopolitics as highlighted by recent events, including Russian President Vladimir Putin’s visits to North Korea and Vietnam and the US presidential debate between Joe Biden and Donald Trump. How do these dimensions offer strategic opportunities for middle powers like India?
SOURCE:
Spread the Word