THE RESOLVE TIBET ACT

Print

TAG: GS 2: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

THE CONTEXT: On June 12, the United States Congress passed the Promoting a Resolution to Tibet-China Dispute Act, commonly known as the Resolve Tibet Act.

EXPLANATION:

• This bipartisan legislation, pending ratification by President Joe Biden, is a significant development in US policy towards Tibet.
• It follows two notable pieces of legislation:
  • the Tibetan Policy Act (TPA) of 2002 and
  • the Tibetan Policy and Support Act (TPSA) of 2020.

Key Provisions of the Resolve Tibet Act

• The Resolve Tibet Act contains several important provisions aimed at countering Chinese influence and supporting the rights of the Tibetan people.
• The act authorizes the use of funds to combat Chinese disinformation regarding Tibet.
• This includes false narratives about Tibet’s history, the Tibetan people, and Tibetan institutions, notably those related to the Dalai Lama.
• The act challenges China’s historical claims over Tibet, advocating for direct and meaningful dialogue between China and the Dalai Lama or his representatives, as well as the democratically elected leaders of the Tibetan community.
• This dialogue is to occur without preconditions, aiming to resolve differences and promote a peaceful settlement.
• The Resolve Tibet Act emphasizes the Tibetan people’s right to self-determination and human rights.
• It highlights China’s obligations as a signatory of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, both of which support these principles.
• The act seeks to acknowledge and address the unique socio-cultural identity of the Tibetan people, focusing on their distinct historical, cultural, religious, and linguistic characteristics.
• The Resolve Tibet Act amends the TPA to precisely define the geographical areas included in the Tibetan Autonomous Region.

Differences from Previous Legislation: Tibetan Policy Act of 2002

• The Resolve Tibet Act marks a significant evolution in US policy on Tibet compared to the TPA and TPSA.
• Tibetan Policy Act of 2002
  • The TPA was the first US legislation specifically addressing Tibet.
  • It took a cautious stance, recognizing China’s claim that Tibet was an integral part of China.
  • The act encouraged dialogue between the Chinese government and the Dalai Lama but stressed that the Dalai Lama was not seeking sovereignty or independence, only greater autonomy for Tibetans within China.
  • The TPA also clarified that the US did not maintain official relations with the Tibetan government-in-exile, led by the Dalai Lama until 2011.
• Tibetan Policy and Support Act of 2020
  • The TPSA built upon the TPA by pushing for constructive dialogue between the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the Dalai Lama or his representatives.
  • It emphasized the need for a “negotiated agreement” and encouraged international support for this dialogue.
  • A notable provision of the TPSA was its assertion that the matter of the Dalai Lama’s succession was not China’s concern and should be decided by Tibetan Buddhists.
• Resolve Tibet Act of 2024
  • The Resolve Tibet Act takes a bolder approach than its predecessors.
  • Unlike the TPA, it does not recognize China’s historical claims over Tibet and instead directly challenges them.
  • It emphasizes the need for unconditional dialogue, aiming for a settlement that respects Tibetan self-determination and human rights.
  • Additionally, it places a stronger focus on countering Chinese disinformation and explicitly supports the distinct identity of the Tibetan people.

Implications and Significance

• The Resolve Tibet Act represents a significant shift in US policy towards Tibet, reflecting a stronger stance against Chinese claims and actions.
• By advocating for unconditional dialogue and supporting Tibetan self-determination, the act aims to foster a fair and lasting resolution to the Tibet-China dispute.

SOURCE: https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-global/resolve-tibet-act-9405328/