THE CONTEXT: The 2024 general election verdict has sparked significant debate, with some viewing it as a revival of democratic dissent and others as a hopeful check on Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s authoritative governance. However, the verdict carries a profound philosophical significance beyond these visible effects, marking a civilizational response to the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and its Hindutva agenda.
THE ISSUES:
- Civilisational Strikes Back: The election results have highlighted a civilizational clash within the Hindu community, driven by the BJP’s Hindutva project. This project, spearheaded by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, aimed to unite Hindus against perceived enemies, mainly Muslims and liberals, and to reclaim India’s “glorious” past. However, this strategy has backfired, leading to counter-polarisation among Hindus rather than creating a unified Hindu monolith.
- Constitution as a Turning Point: The Constitution has emerged as a central issue in the 2024 elections. The BJP’s attempts to change the Constitution, allegedly to undermine affirmative action and other democratic principles, have been met with significant resistance. The opposition capitalized on statements from BJP leaders suggesting constitutional changes, which created widespread concern and mobilized voters to protect the Constitution.
- Hindutva’s Counterproductive Politics: Hindutva’s civilizational call has proven counterproductive, polarising Hindus instead of uniting them. The BJP’s focus on anti-minority rhetoric and attempts to alter the Constitution have alienated many within the Hindu community, particularly those who benefit from affirmative action and social justice measures. This has led to a significant electoral setback for the BJP, as seen in their defeat in key constituencies like Ayodhya.
- Overestimated Political Acumen: The BJP’s political strategy, which relied heavily on Modi’s popularity and Hindutva rhetoric, has been overestimated. The party’s failure to secure a majority and the rise of a strong opposition bloc indicate their approach has significant vulnerabilities. The opposition’s focus on social justice and constitutional integrity resonated more with voters than the BJP’s communal and divisive tactics.
- Impact of Social Justice and Affirmative Action: The election results underscore the importance of social justice and affirmative action in Indian politics. The opposition’s emphasis on protecting these principles was crucial to their electoral gains. The BJP’s perceived threat to these measures mobilized a significant portion of the electorate, particularly among the lower castes and marginalized communities.
- Future of Hindutva and Opposition’s Role: The future of the Hindutva project appears uncertain following the 2024 elections. The BJP’s strategy of using Hindu nationalism to consolidate power has faced significant pushback. The opposition now has the task of keeping the debate on the Constitution and social justice alive, ensuring that the BJP’s communal agenda does not regain traction. The opposition must continue to highlight the real issues facing the Hindu have-nots and prevent their exploitation for communal goals.
THE WAY FORWARD:
- Strengthening Constitutional Protections and Secularism: Reaffirm and strengthen the secular principles enshrined in the Indian Constitution to ensure equal rights and protections for all religious communities. Sarkaria Commission Report (1988) emphasized the need for maintaining the secular character of the Indian state and recommended measures to prevent communalism. Articles 25-28 guarantee freedom of religion, and Article 15 prohibits discrimination based on religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth.
- Promoting Social Justice and Affirmative Action: Enhance affirmative action policies to address socio-economic disparities and ensure equitable opportunities for historically disadvantaged communities. Articles 15(4) and 16(4) allow affirmative action to uplift socially and educationally backward classes. The National Sample Survey Office (NSSO) data shows significant socio-economic disparities among different caste groups.
- Combating Communalism and Hate Speech: Implement stringent measures to fight communalism, hate speech, and violence against religious minorities. National Integration Council (NIC) Recommends measures to promote communal harmony and prevent violence. Article 19(2) allows for reasonable restrictions on freedom of speech to avoid hate speech and maintain public order.
- Ensuring Judicial Independence and Accountability: Strengthen the judiciary’s independence and accountability to safeguard democratic values and protect citizens’ rights. Articles 124-147 outline the judiciary’s structure and independence. The Supreme Court’s intervention in cases of executive overreaches, such as the NJAC judgment (2015), reaffirmed judicial independence.
- Strengthening Civil Society and Democratic Institutions: Empower civil society organizations and strengthen democratic institutions to promote accountability and participatory governance. The Second Administrative Reforms Commission (2005-2009) Recommended measures to enhance the role of civil society in governance and ensure transparency and accountability. Articles 19(1)(c) and 19(1)(d) guarantee the right to form associations and move freely throughout the territory of India.
THE CONCLUSION:
The 2024 election has delivered a civilizational rebuff to the BJP, exposing the flaws in its Hindutva project and highlighting the enduring strength of the Constitution. The Opposition now faces the crucial task of sustaining the fight for social justice and ensuring that the Hindu have-nots are no longer misled into supporting communal goals.
UPSC PAST YEAR QUESTIONS:
Q.1 Why is caste identity in India both fluid and static? 2023
Q.2 The Constitution of India is a living instrument with capabilities of enormous dynamism. It is a constitution made for a progressive society. Illustrate the expanding horizons of the right to life and personal liberty. 2023
Q.3 Are tolerance, assimilation, and pluralism the key elements in making an Indian form of secularism? Justify your answer. 2022
Q.4 “The caste system is assuming new identities and associational forms. Hence, the caste system cannot be eradicated in India.” Comment. 2018
Q.5 Distinguish between religiousness/religiosity and communalism, giving one example of how the former has been transformed into the latter in independent India. 2017
MAINS PRACTICE QUESTION:
Q.1 Analyze the election result’s impact on the perceived unity or division within society and the role of caste and class in shaping political preferences.
SOURCE:
Spread the Word