Table of Contents
THE CONTEXT: The 2024 Indian general election results have sparked conversations that shed light on the evolving relationship between society and the state in the country. Contrasting perspectives from voters highlight a shift in how democracy is perceived, with the state increasingly seen as an embodiment of societal interests rather than a distinct entity.
THE ISSUES:
- Conflation of Society and Nation: There is a persistent myth in India that conflates the idea of “society” with that of the “nation.” It argues that in post-colonial countries like India, political leaders pinned their hopes for emancipation on the idea of the nation, which was seen as a symbol of togetherness and striving for the common good. However, there is now a strong sense that it is not the nation but rather the state that is central to Indian life.
- The State as a Mechanism of Enforcement: The state, with its bureaucracies, policing bodies, and vast financial resources, is now seen as an enforcement mechanism. This suggests an acceptance that what is good for the state is also suitable for society and that its mechanisms must be utilized to thwart the objectives of perceived enemies of humanity.
- The Collapse of the Society-State Distinction: It is argued that the distinction between society and the state has collapsed and that the state has acquired a charismatic personality. This has produced a particular danger for democratic politics, as the latter depends on not accepting that what is good for the state is unquestioningly good for society.
- The Charismatic State: It is warned about the dangers of the “charismatic state,” where the state is treated as a personality rather than a mechanistic device for public welfare. This leads to unquestioning admiration and support for centralized forms of power, undermining ideas of freedom, autonomy, and the public good.
- Threats to Democratic Culture: The most fundamental threat to democratic culture does not come from hyper or bigotry-inspired nationalism but rather from the rise of the charismatic state, which impairs the capacity to object to its actions by believing that whatever it does is for the benefit of society.
- The Triumph of Independent Thought: Independent thought favoring genuine social and public welfare has triumphed over the dangers of statism. It suggests that the question should not be about why Indians do not subscribe to constitutional values but rather under what conditions and through which means those of statism undermine the values of constitutionalism.
THE WAY FORWARD:
- Strengthening Constitutional Literacy and Civic Education: Implement comprehensive constitutional literacy and civic education programs across all levels of the education system. This can help teach an understanding of the Constitution’s fundamental principles, such as the separation of powers, checks and balances, fundamental rights, and the distinction between state and society.
- Promoting Independent Media and Freedom of Expression: Strengthen the independence of media institutions and safeguard freedom of expression. A vibrant and diverse media landscape can act as a watchdog against state overreach, foster public discourse, and amplify dissenting voices.
- Empowering Civil Society and Grassroots Movements: Foster a robust and inclusive civil society by supporting grassroots movements, non-governmental organizations, and community-based initiatives. These entities can act as intermediaries between the state and society, articulating diverse interests and holding the state accountable
- Strengthening Institutional Checks and Balances: Reinforce the independence and autonomy of key institutions, such as the judiciary, election commission, and anti-corruption agencies. These institutions serve as crucial checks and balances on exercising state power and can help maintain the separation of powers.
- Fostering Inclusive and Participatory Governance: Promote inclusive and participatory governance mechanisms involving citizens in decision-making. This can be achieved through public consultations, citizen advisory boards, and decentralized governance structures. India has experimented with decentralized governance through initiatives like the Panchayati Raj system, which aims to empower local self-governance.
THE CONCLUSION:
The triumph of independent thought over the dangers of statism in the 2024 elections is a positive step towards preserving genuine democratic values. However, the blurring of lines between state and society remains a significant threat to constitutionalism and public welfare. Vigilance is required to ensure that the state remains a mechanism for societal good rather than a charismatic entity immune to dissent and scrutiny.
UPSC PAST YEAR QUESTIONS:
Q.1 The Constitution of India is a living instrument with capabilities of enormous dynamism. It is a constitution made for a progressive society. Illustrate the expanding horizons of the right to life and personal liberty. 2023
Q.2 Constitutional Morality’ is rooted in the Constitution and founded on its essential facets. Explain the doctrine of ‘Constitutional Morality’ with the help of relevant judicial decisions. 2021
MAINS PRACTICE QUESTION:
Q.1 Examine how the conflation of state and society undermines the principles of constitutionalism and democracy.
SOURCE:
Spread the Word