THE CONTEXT: It has been a decade since the bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh into two states, Andhra Pradesh, and Telangana. This division offers a significant opportunity to examine the political, economic, and historical implications for the Telugu people and the Indian Republic. The initial criticism surrounding the bifurcation has dissipated, and both states are moving forward with little nostalgia for their shared past.
ISSUES:
- Lack of Nostalgia and Unity: Despite a long history of being under one political authority, Andhra Pradesh and Telangana regions have moved on with little nostalgia for their shared past. This raises questions about the strength of linguistic unity as a basis for state formation in India.
- Economic and Political Disparities: The bifurcation has led to significant changes in the political clout of the two new states. Andhra Pradesh, with fewer Lok Sabha seats, has lost its earlier influence, while Telangana, despite having Hyderabad, faces its own set of challenges. This disparity could lead to strains in India’s federal structure.
- Unresolved Grievances: Both states have not fully articulated their grievances regarding the bifurcation process. Issues such as the division of joint assets, special category status, and financial assistance for building a new capital for Andhra Pradesh remain unresolved.
- Impact on Federal Structure: The bifurcation has highlighted the potential for unequal sizes and political power among Indian states, which could lead to friction and disenchantment. The Indian Republic must reconsider its organizing principles beyond linguistic lines.
- Future of Linguistic States: Given the regional economic disparities, linguistic divergences, and variations in political culture, there are significant questions about whether other linguistic states in India might face fates like Andhra Pradesh.
- Need for Alternative Organizing Principles: The bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh suggests that India might need to look for alternative principles for state organization, such as the size of territory or population, to ensure a more balanced distribution of political and economic power.
THE WAY FORWARD:
- Establishment of a Permanent Inter-State Council: The Sarkaria Commission recommended the establishment of a permanent Inter-State Council under Article 263 of the Constitution to facilitate continuous dialogue and cooperation between states and the central government. This council can address ongoing disputes and ensure smoother implementation of bifurcation agreements.
- Special Financial Assistance and Economic Packages: The Finance Commission has often recommended special financial assistance to states facing economic challenges. Andhra Pradesh has suffered economically due to the bifurcation. To provide additional financial support, Grant Andhra Pradesh special category status. Allocate specific economic packages for infrastructure development, including constructing a new capital city and completing pending projects like the Polavaram project.
- Judicial and Administrative Mechanisms for Asset Division: The Sheela Bhide Committee recommended dividing assets and liabilities between Andhra Pradesh and Telangana. However, many of these recommendations remain unimplemented due to disagreements. Establish a special tribunal or fast-track court to oversee and expedite the resolution of disputes related to asset division. Form joint administrative committees to manage and supervise the division of assets listed in Schedules IX and X of the AP Reorganization Act, 2014.
- Enhanced Political Representation and Governance Reforms: The Punchhi Commission recommended governance reforms to strengthen political stability and representation. To maintain political stability, implement fixed terms for governors and ensure their removal only through a structured process. Strengthen governance structures to ensure better representation and address regional disparities. Facilitate continuous political dialogue between the states and the central government to address grievances and ensure cooperative federalism.
- Development of Backward Regions and Infrastructure Projects: Several commissions, such as the Sarkari and Punchhi Commission, have emphasized the need for focused development of backward regions to reduce economic disparities. Allocate specific grants for developing backward areas of both Andhra Pradesh and Telangana. As the AP Reorganisation Act outlines, prioritize and expedite infrastructure projects, including road connectivity, power plants, and educational institutions.
THE CONCLUSION:
The bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh raises critical questions about the sustainability of linguistic reorganization as a principle for state formation in India. The process and its aftermath highlight the need for a more thoughtful and mature approach to significant political changes. The lessons from this division are crucial for ensuring the stability and unity of the Indian Republic in the future.
UPSC PAST YEAR QUESTIONS:
Q.1 Many State Governments further bifurcate geographical administrative areas like Districts and Talukas for better governance. Considering the above, can it also be justified that more smaller States would bring in effective governance at State level? Discuss. 2013
Q.2 Though the federal principle is dominant in our Constitution and that principle is one of its basic features, but it is equally true that federalism under the Indian Constitution leans in favour of a strong Centre. This feature militates against the concept of strong federalism. Discuss. 2014
Q.3 How far do you think cooperation, competition and confrontation have shaped the nature of federation in India? Cite some recent examples to validate your answer. 2020
MAINS PRACTICE QUESTION:
Q.1 Analyze the potential challenges the Indian Republic might face if the principle of linguistic reorganization of states fails to hold. What alternative principles could be considered for organizing states in India?
SOURCE:
Spread the Word