FOUR WAYS THE ISRAEL-HAMAS-IRAN CONFLICT HAS LED TO A MORE VOLATILE MIDDLE EAST

THE CONTEXT: Israel’s military campaign to eliminate Hamas has led to the destruction of Gaza and a humanitarian crisis. Iran and its allies have united in support of the Palestinian cause, escalating regional tensions. Recent Iranian attacks on Israel and Israeli strikes on Iranian interests have changed the dynamics of the conflict.

 ISSUES:

  • Regional Unity and Shia-Sunni Relations: The conflict has led to a thawing of the traditionally icy Shia-Sunni relations. Shia groups like Hezbollah and the Houthis, along with Iran, have shown open support for the Sunni Palestinians. This marks a significant shift towards regional unity against perceived US-Israeli dominance, highlighting the formation of what is referred to as the Axis of Resistance.
  • Expansion of the Conflict: The war has broadened its scope and affected not just the immediate region but also involved the US more directly. The US has become a central figure in trying to contain the conflict’s expansion, with its bases across Syria, Iraq, and Jordan being targeted by hundreds of rocket and drone attacks since October 7. The US and Iran have managed to avoid direct military confrontation, but the situation remains volatile, with ongoing challenges in restraining all state and non-state actors involved.
  • Diplomatic Shifts in the Arab World: Sunni Arab states, aligned with Saudi Arabia, have opted for a diplomatic approach, advocating for ceasefires and supporting humanitarian efforts. They have also called for a two-state solution, aligning with US-led peace initiatives. Notably, Saudi Arabia has paused its normalization of ties with Israel, conditioning any diplomatic relations on the recognition of an independent Palestinian state with pre-1967 borders and East Jerusalem as its capital.
  • Maritime Disruptions by Houthis: The Houthis have effectively disrupted a critical maritime communication lane, impacting global trade. Environmental factors like drought conditions in the Panama Canal have compounded this disruption, forcing costly adjustments in global shipping routes and schedules.
  • Economic Impact and Military Engagements: The Israeli economy has faced significant strain, with estimates of the war costing over a quarter of a billion dollars daily as of October last year. The conflict has led to a 20% shrinkage in the Israeli economy in the previous quarter of 2023. Military engagements have continued with Israel asserting its determination to eliminate Hamas and secure the release of all hostages, despite international calls for restraint and alternative strategies to direct ground operations.

THE WAY FORWARD:

  • Revival of Dialogue and Negotiations: Immediate efforts should focus on reviving dialogue between Israel and Hamas, with the mediation of the US, Qatar, and Egypt. This should aim at negotiating a prolonged ceasefire, ensuring the flow of humanitarian aid to Gaza, and securing the release of remaining Israeli hostages.
  • International Mediation for Israel-Iran Conflict: An international initiative, possibly under the auspices of the UN or involving significant powers like the EU, should mediate a sustainable ceasefire between Israel and Iran. This initiative should facilitate direct talks to build trust and find common ground.
  • Engagement of Regional Powers: Regional powers, including Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states, should be actively involved in advocating for peace and supporting diplomatic efforts. Their role in pushing for a two-state solution and normalization processes aligned with the 1967 borders could be crucial.
  • Comprehensive Security Framework: Develop a regional security architecture that includes confidence-building measures, arms control agreements, and conflict resolution mechanisms. This framework should involve all stakeholders in the Middle East to ensure collective security and stability.
  • Restrained Military Response: While Israel’s security concerns are valid, it should aim for a restrained military response coordinated with international law and humanitarian considerations. The focus should be on defensive measures rather than offensive actions that escalate the conflict.
  • Disarmament Initiatives: Operationalize UN decisions regarding the disarmament of weapons of mass destruction in the Middle East. This includes revisiting and strengthening the Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA) with the involvement of the United States and Iran.

THE CONCLUSION:

There is a possibility of talks between Hamas and Israel, mediated by the US, Qatar, and Egypt. The broader Middle East has been destabilized, with shifting alliances and increased regional conflict. The economic and strategic costs of the war are significant, and the Israel-Iran conflict poses a long-term threat to regional peace and stability.

UPSC PAST YEAR QUESTION:

Q.1 A number of outside powers have entrenched themselves in Central Asia, which is a zone of interest to India. Discuss the implications, in this context, of India’s joining the Ashgabat Agreement in 2018. 2018

MAINS PRACTICE QUESTION:

Q.1 Analyze the implications of the recent Israel-Iran conflict on the geopolitical landscape of the Middle East. Discuss the role of international actors in managing the crisis and suggest measures that could lead to sustainable peace in the region.

SOURCE:

https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/editorials/age-is-just-a-number-a-study-may-help-make-the-argument-9287244/

Spread the Word