THE CONTEXT: The implications of the Registration of Births and Deaths (Amendment) Act, 2023, which mandates the recording of parents’ religion in the birth registration process in India, imprints many dilemmas. It critiques this requirement as a potential infringement on individual rights and a step towards communalism and majoritarianism. Assigning a religion at birth can limit personal growth and freedom, impacting a child’s ability to develop their beliefs and moral framework.
ISSUES:
- Violation of Human Rights: The practice of labeling a child’s religion at birth is criticized as a violation of human rights. It imposes predefined religious identities on children, potentially restricting their freedom and personal growth. This is a retrogressive measure that could harm the child’s development and autonomy.
- Threat to Democratic Values: By enforcing religious labels from birth, the law is perceived as undermining democratic principles and promoting divisive ideologies like communalism, patriarchy, and majoritarianism. This could lead to societal divisions and discrimination based on religious identities.
- Impact on Child Development: A significant portion of a child’s brain development occurs in the early years, and the environment, including imposed religious beliefs, can profoundly shape their lifelong attitudes and beliefs. This early imposition of religion could stifle a child’s ability to develop a personal moral and ethical framework.
- Potential for Abuse: The requirement to register a child’s religion could be misused for political or social control, reinforcing negative stereotypes and social divisions. It could also lead to increased surveillance and profiling based on religious identities.
- Historical and Philosophical Concerns: Historical figures like Gautama Buddha and Galileo argue that imposing a rigid religious identity from birth could prevent individuals from achieving their full potential and contributing to societal progress. Personal spiritual and intellectual growth should be free from institutionalized religious constraints.
- Legal and Privacy Issues: There are concerns about the legal implications of linking religious identity with official documents from birth, which could infringe on privacy rights and lead to discrimination.
THE WAY FORWARD:
- Judicial Review: If the amendment is not feasible politically, affected individuals or human rights organizations could challenge the constitutionality of the Act in court. The judiciary could play a crucial role in examining whether the Act infringes on fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution.
- Protection of Privacy: Strengthening data protection laws to ensure that any data collected, including religious affiliation, is strictly used for administrative purposes and not for profiling or discrimination.
- Promoting Scientific Temperament: Educational curricula should emphasize critical thinking, scientific reasoning, and the questioning of orthodoxies. This approach would help cultivate a generation that values evidence-based reasoning over blind adherence to tradition.
- Interfaith Dialogues: Promoting dialogues between religious and cultural groups can enhance mutual understanding and reduce prejudices. Respected community leaders, scholars, and activists can facilitate these dialogues.
- Ethical Training Programs: Implement training programs for all stakeholders involved in the data collection and processing under the new Act. Training should focus on ethical handling of sensitive information, respecting individual privacy, and understanding the implications of data misuse, as highlighted in.
- Right to Opt-Out and Correct Information: Provide individuals with the legal right to opt out of having their religious information recorded or to correct it if necessary. This would respect individual autonomy and align with the ethical principles of consent and personal freedom.
THE CONCLUSION:
Emphasizing the profound influence of early childhood environments on developing personal beliefs and societal norms, the piece warns against the dangers of institutionalizing divisive ideologies through laws that may seem benign but have more profound implications for communal harmony and individual freedom. The piece advocates for a more open and flexible approach to religious identity, allowing individuals like Gautama Buddha to explore and define their beliefs without legal or societal constraints.
UPSC PAST YEAR QUESTIONS:
Q.1 Humans should always be treated as ‘ends’ and never merely `means.’ Explain the meaning and significance of this statement, giving its implications in the modern techno-economic society. 2014
Q.2 The actual rule in determining whether to embrace or reject anything is not whether it has any evil in it but whether it has more evil than good. There are few things wholly evil or wholly good. Almost everything, especially governmental policy, is an inseparable compound of the two, so our best judgment of the preponderance between them is continually demanded. ” Abraham Lincoln. 2018
Q.3 Life doesn’t make any sense without interdependence. We need each other, and the sooner we learn that it is better for us all” – Erik Erikson 2021
Q.4 What teachings of Buddha are most relevant today and why? Discuss. 2018
MAINS PRACTICE QUESTION:
Q.1 Discuss the implications of the Registration of Births and Deaths (Amendment) Act, 2023, which mandates the recording of parents’ religion in the birth registration process. Critically evaluate the potential impacts of this amendment on communal harmony and individual freedom in India. Use relevant examples to substantiate your arguments.
SOURCE:
Spread the Word